RBI’s restructuring guidelines of 6 August 2020 protect the largest and most volatile sector from near-term shocks. This is an important positive for the market and reduces the short-term downside risks. However, macro challenges persist, and we expected a slow recovery as the effects of the pandemic gradually reduce. We are moving to reduce cash in our portfolios, but our stock-picking approach remains unchanged. We continue to focus on quality stocks, market leaders with strong cash flows and balance sheets, reducing sector concentration and remain selective about our banking sector exposures.
RBI steps in, again
The RBI’s announcement of liberal restructuring norms for banks is a strong short-term positive for sector. The relief was needed as the pandemic-induced lockdown has disrupted cash flows for many borrowers and tagging NPLs on a 90-day basis would do more harm than good. The critical difference is that the restructuring is at the lender’s discretion, while the moratorium is a borrower’s entitlement. The banks now have greater control of the process and can take steps to maximise the recoverability of the loans.
We have two areas of concern. First, the 10% provision is not enough and the schedule of reversing these provisions is too quick. The provisioning requirement should have been the same as NPAs – 20% upfront with a one-year performance requirement before reversal. This would encourage banks to restructure with greater responsibility, focusing only on recoverability. Second, the RBI mandates disclosures of the restructured book only from Mar-21. This means that the true picture of bank balance sheets will not be visible for another 8-9 months. It is critical, therefore, to judge banks by their past track records of credit behaviour, corporate governance, and disclosure standards as investors, to a large extent, will be “playing blind”.
This restructuring scheme does not protect banks from facing large NPAs and loan losses over the next 4-6 quarters. It gives them greater control of the outcomes, helps them minimise losses and spread the impact over time rather than take a concentrated hit. This is a vital positive that helps them protect their franchises and minimise the risks to financial stability.
Real estate is a major beneficiary. The industry and its lenders have been clamouring for this dispensation. It allows companies to access incremental funds and complete many of the stranded projects. This has many positive externalities for the broader economy – ranging from blue-collar employment to demand for products like steel and cement.
Macro challenges persist
The short-term risks may have been addressed, but we still see significant challenges for the economy over the medium term.
Credit capacity is still constrained. The RBI measure will reduce risk-aversion, especially among PSU banks. However, they remain capital-constrained and the government will find it difficult to pump in the required equity, given the acute fiscal strain in FY21. Smaller private banks and NBFCs, on the other hand, continue to struggle with weak balance sheets. Only a handful of 4-5 private banks have the capital and deposit base to grow their book, and that is not enough to aid macro growth.
The capex cycle has multiple headwinds, which could take a long time to solve. Project finance from the private sector will remain constrained for a long time, given the poor experience of the last decade. Government capacity to fund projects is limited and has got worse after the pandemic crisis. Some innovative attempts are being made to create alternate funding sources by recycling operating assets, but that will take some time to have an impact. A sustained growth revival is not possible without a strong capex recovery.
The consumption shock will linger well into FY22. The direct impact on incomes is compounded by a weakening of consumer confidence, which will feed into lower demand for discretionary goods. We do not expect normalised demand to come back very soon, beyond the immediate spike that is expected when the lockdown is lifted. Return to 85-90% normalcy could be quick, but the last 5-10% will be a harder struggle.
Braced for a slow recovery. The good news is that an immediate crisis has been averted – the RBI’s actions over the last six months have ensured that. The worry is that the economy will take 1-2 years before a full recovery, and we are braced for that. Quality companies with resilient business models will cope better than others, and we are not expecting a rising tide to lift all boats in the medium term.
Our broader approach to the markets remains unchanged, but we are making a few adjustments as the environment changes.
Near-term downside risks to the market are mitigated. We will continue to steadily deploy and reduce our cash levels. Deployment to new portfolios are also being stepped up and we will focus on accelerating that process, too. Our overall philosophy of investing new inflows over a period of time remains unchanged.
We are reinforcing our quality bias. We will remain with market leaders, strong balance sheets, high/improving return ratios and resilient businesses. We do not think that this is the time to bottom-fish in stressed names, despite the relief granted by the RBI.
We continue to diversify our exposures and avoid concentration risks in any sector. In that context, we believe that the winners of the last decade may not be the winners in the future, and are looking to newer sectors like pharma, chemicals, and telecom for the next wave of winners.
We will remain selective in our approach to bank stocks. The relative winners will be the 4-5 private banks with strong balance sheets, but we worry that the returns from the last 4-5 years are unlikely to be replicated. We do not believe that we can depend on these stocks for outperformance, as we have been used to.
Head of Research
Alchemy Capital Management Pvt. Ltd